Theme Layout

Boxed or Wide or Framed

[Wide]

Theme Translation

Display Featured Slider

Featured Slider Styles

Display Grid Slider

Grid Slider Styles

[style1][caption3]

Display Trending Posts

Display Author Bio

Display Instagram Footer

SLIDER

The Time Traveler's Wife (2009)


Time fades everything: from material possessions to memories, nothing lasts. This we do know - there is a said time for everything…

For Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) that has become more of a reality than mere thought. Ever since a tragic car accident that took the life of his mother when he was only six, Henry “vanishes” into the past to revisit people who are no longer in his life or form a special bond with the small, precocious girl who grew up to become his wife. Clare Abshire (Rachel McAdams) has been in love with Henry ever since he “appeared” in her favorite meadow near her home. When they finally meet as adults in college, she jumps at the chance to know and understand more than just a little girl’s fantasy. After a brief dating relationship, the inseparable lovers are married, much to the dismay of Clare’s friend (Ron Livingston). Even as newlyweds Clare finds she is alone more often than not throughout the early years of their marriage, including their first Christmas. During their tempestuous marriage, Henry and Clare somehow find a middle ground, both learning to cope with the frequent separations. In their rare moments of happiness, they realize life together is to be brief before uncontrollable events lead to tragedy. 

For me, seeing this was a long time coming back at its release to DVD. The result of the movie both surprised and disappointed me. Unusual of my viewing habits (in relation to something of this genre – I nearly always have to know the ending), I had no idea how the film ended, what I did understand was that it wasn't to be a happy one. To filmmakers’ credit, they show us exactly what will happen before credits roll and that perhaps makes it a bit easier to accept, but at the same time more difficult with the expectation of tragedy. All melancholy aside, what really strikes us about this story (based on a best-selling novel) is the realization that there is no purpose to Henry’s traveling – something that becomes evident once we gain our bearings (the film is consistently more confusing than not). In chatting about this film with a friend, she suggested that perhaps that was the ultimate message, illustrating that sometimes we are forced to cope with difficult things that there is no earthly control or explanation of. That is one way to look at the message. Then, perhaps where filmmakers do fail is missing the mark in suggesting such a message – or whatever impact they may have intended for the film; learning to live with something that one cannot influence may not always be able to be interpreted in a skillful way, but I do think there would have been certain situations where this could have been expressed better. Similarly, not only does the basic story set the tone for a gloomy experience, but also the scenes nearly always represent morbid reactions. Unfortunately, the blissful times are all but fast-forwarded through, never letting us relish in the family’s happier times, only making us feel worse at the eventual outcome.

This isn’t a movie (rated PG13) for young viewers – for reasons that are listed at the footnote of this review. Mainly this is because of the movie contains troubling thematic matters that are more mature than a lot of other movies in this genre. I realize that is strictly my opinion, but I am firm in it. It has been difficult for me to decide just what I thought of this. Without a doubt I will want a second rental, hopefully with an end result getting my thoughts of the movie in order – it is such an unusual story. If there is one thing The Time Traveler’s Wife perfected, it’s a uniqueness about it that is rare in movies today. Sporadic scenes remain sweet, as is the acting, in general well-played. (McAdams is a fabulous actress.) Somehow after a fairly lackluster, slow-moving screenplay (no reflection on the acting), the end manages to leave you holding your breath, hoping Clare will make her destination in time leaving us at least satisfied if not completely “happy” at the climax. Filming where this scene takes place is lovely (as is the cinematography) and even if it’s not viewers’ ideal, the close does coax a smile. Not of the ordinary sort, but rather in realizing that the characters are going to be “okay,” even faced with unexplainable events.

This isn’t a sweeping film that is guaranteed to leave you singing its praises, but it, regardless leaves you with quite a lot to think about. The whole premise of the story may be disturbing to some. (Henry’s appearances and disappearances in various stages of life; for example, on his wedding, he is present as an older version of himself.) It will make you cry, and root for certain things, but rarely does it bring a smile. So long as you know what to expect, without having high expectations, The Time Traveler’s Wife is worth renting... Even if for no other reason than its ability to make us think about how fleeting time is, allowing for life to go on with little opportunity to cherish the beautiful in life.

(Parental review; there are several instances of partial nudity. Henry appears at his destinations nude. Likewise, Clare is seen leaving bed [a full, but brief shot of her back is glimpsed]. On their first date, Clare and Henry spend the night together [she begins to undress as they fall onto the couch. Clare becomes pregnant when meeting Henry from the past. Beforehand, the couple suffers numerous miscarriages, suggesting the baby time traveled. Profanity is sprinkled throughout. There is a short-lived fistfight; a man is fatally shot, with some blood [impact unseen].)
QuickEdit
Rissi
10 Comments
Share :

10 comments:

  1. This gives me a much fuller picture of a movie whose premise I didn't quite understand in the first place. Thank you for that!

    Thanks for your recent comments on my blog! I hope you don't mind if I smiled at the one you left for Annie J., presumably thinking it was me. Honestly, I'm surprised she and I don't get confused more often. :]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cubette - you are welcome. I hope you enjoy this if you decide to see it. =)

    Annie - oh! I am glad; thanks! I saw this movie a while back, wrote up the review and "polished" it to post. If I'd watch it again today, my opinion might change but I did quite like the film - it was unique if nothing else.

    Ha! That whole-mistaken-comment-thing made me laugh (and it was a bit embarrassing when I realized my error *grin*).

    As always, I am glad you visited, Annie. =)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Given that it's six-something in the morning and dreary outside with the snow and I haven't been awake all that long, I hope you will smile when I say that instead of "Time Traveler's Wife" when glancing at my blog fed, I saw "Time LORD's Wife" and my first thought was, "... wait, Rissi's not a Doctor Who fan. OH!" LOL

    I don't remember much about this movie other than that it was sad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Charity - that did make me smile! =) I've not seen a single episode of "Doctor Who," but sometimes I think it'd be interesting.

    This movie was sad, but yet, for some reason I did like it - which is weird for me.

    I wondered if you guys were getting any snow yet - and you are! Oh! The joys of winter. =)

    ReplyDelete
  5. You ought to see at least one episode someday. Possibly "The Doctor's Wife."

    *spends some time giggling*

    Seriously, though, if you could sit through the Green Lantern and enjoy it, you could survive Doctor Who. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Rissi!
    I have a blog award for you on my blog, It's a Love Story!
    Come check it out girlie ;)
    With love,
    Rebekah Brielle
    PS. Wonderful post!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Charity - hmmm... I'll have to remember that about "Doctor Who."

    Hey, are you makin' fun of "Green Lantern"!? LOL! Actually, I cannot blame you; the movie was sillier than all get outs, but I like Ryan - had he not starred, I might not have cared. ;D

    Rebekah - much thanks!! I appreciate you including me in the list of bloggers to receive this award. =)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm one of those rare gals that read and hated the book and consequently couldn't get into the film.

    Have you read it?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh, I know how that goes, Juju! Normally I prefer reading the novel first before seeing a film because it's easier for me to get through the book prior to the film adaptation.

    The movie is a little... "different" but I actually did enjoy it. And, that is rare for me because I prefer happy-ever-afters.

    I've not read the book, but I should sometime... and I need to re-watch the film again, too. I saw it once a couple of years ago. I don't know how different the book vs. the film is as a result...

    ReplyDelete

Have a thought? Don't be shy, go ahead and leave one... or two... or three! I reply to every comment. If you're new to the blog, please don't hesitate to introduce yourself and your blog - we love chatting around here!

Feedback and every comment is appreciated and read - I always leave a response; your opinions are respected and I ask that you show mine the same courtesy.

(If you post under “anonymous,” please leave a name. If you don't have a Google account, you can type your name into the Name/URL and if you have no site, just leave "URL" blank.)

If you are still reading my ramblings, thank you for following this little blog and for being one of its supporters. I’ve enjoyed getting to know each of you, friends!

Follow @rissi006