Gone (2012)


Amanda Seyfried is a stereotyped actress. She has a reputation for playing the sweet fiancĂ©e or more of the girl-next-door than she does that of an action star – and she does well in those roles. The pretty blue-eyed blonde doesn’t seem to have the right stature it takes to make a good kick-butt kind of star as this role would requite but to her credit, she pulls it off.

No one is taking her seriously… they didn’t then and they aren’t now. Not the police or her younger sister. But Jill Clayton (Seyfried) is not going to be known as that “crazy Clayton girl.” She knows what happened to her and she is not going to stop until she can prove it. Following the death of her parents within six months of each other, Jill was devastated and after that she was kidnapped out of her own home. Miraculously, she is the one victim of the serial killer to escape and best him. Her reports to the police eventually go unsolved when a search team cannot find the pit that she said she was held in and she shows no sign of abuse. Following that, she is put into a mental institution before her sister Molly (Emily Wickersham) secures her release, and later moves in with her, unable to pay the rent as a college student. Jill isn’t willing to give up so easily. Every chance she gets she goes out to the forest park where she was held, ruling out locations and trying to find where she was held. Then it happens all over again… only this time, Molly disappears.

Frantic, Jill searches their home and again goes to see the detective who was once in charge of her case. Powers (Daniel Sunjata) listens again to Jill’s stories but he and the ranking detective who worked her case figure her claims are just that: Everything she says has to be just in her head...right? Everyone assumes Molly has just run off with a friend or her boyfriend (Sebastian Stan) except for the new-guy-on-the-case, Detective Hood (Wes Bentley). He wants to help Jill but she is too suspicious of everyone to extend much trust: Is his offer genuine or does he have an ulterior motive?

One of the movies that was not screened for critics (they say that is always a “bad” indicator), I can see why this didn’t turn out to be a success but Gone is surprisingly good in its delivery and the acting isn’t half bad. Its big-name cast gives the movie recognition and the plot isn’t as pathetic as most potential viewers may think. All of the actors give decent performances, including those whose part may be credited in the opening but is actually very minor while Seyfried delivers an authentic performance; she has a fragility that may seem weak in the role but is actually advantageous to the character. She is a broken woman having gone through a low time when her mental stability may not have been the best. She survived and escaped a twisted kidnapper and still she is living her life – no matter how paranoid she may be. Likewise, Emily Wickersham gives a believable performance. Ironically both girls have troubled pasts – Jill with her mental instability and Molly as a former drinker which makes everyone doubt the legitimacy of these allegations all the more.

The script isn’t fabulous – in fact, nearly five minutes pass before a word is uttered (more about this later) but the suspense isn’t terrible. I was on the edge of my seat a time or two and the overall ambience of mystery was fabulously plotted. Just insignificant things like everyone distrusting Jill or guys walking the darkened streets with hoodies on all lend credence to the real fear that has led to Jill’s paranoia. In part what I did like about the story was that the audience never questions the validity of Jill’s story – we “know” it to be true. It is one of the reasons the film works so well. Because Jill isn’t a government agent or spy (like so many in this genre are), the movie really works hard to not be “exciting.” There aren’t scenes that give way to chase or a shoot-out but there is a car chase and Jill must escape on foot a time or two. After all… there does have to be some excitement – right?

As I said earlier in the review, Gone definitely tends more on the slow side. There are a lot of moments in which Jill is simply doing Internet searches or knocking on doors but I think to work, this movie needed that. As a character, Jill was driven to do whatever it took to see her sister’s safe return and it was a realistic expectation not to make this into a female version of Taken. One thing I will say; the ending is quite unsatisfying in that it is not one made of sunshine and rainbows, instead it just… ends. It isn’t necessarily a bad ending either because there wouldn’t have been anything else to tell but it felt… incomplete somehow. The fact that we don’t doubt Jill’s ordeal does make the final scene seem sweet with payback – a bit of revenge for Jill and I do love that last line she gives the detectives. Certainly not the best movie of the year, this is far from the worst. It provides anyone who likes a mystery with some edge-of-your-seat thrills and chills and allows the heroine to have the last word while still somehow making us root for her. It is one that gives us something to ponder – if nothing else, it makes us realize that we do have to be on defense in a world filled with scary people.

(Parental review: Rated PG13, the movie shows a shot of a woman showering with a full side view [she is shadowed by the curtain]. There might be a sexual innuendo [a one-sided conversation implies a guy wants to spend the night with his girlfriend]; a woman takes pills for a condition, and there is reference to drugs and alcoholism. Guns are fired and one man is shot three times then lit on fire [we hear his screams]. There are some tense moments. There is profanity including one use of the f-word, sh*t and others.) 
QuickEdit
Rissi
9 Comments

9 comments:

  1. I want to see this movie, the plot sounds interesting. But I think I will watch it with someone so I can duck behind them when the kidnapper appears, they scare me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. it did seem more of a suspenseful kind of movie. great review, girl! as always! glad to know that amanda seyfried ddi some justice for this type of role. i think she's trying to broaden her roles a bit. good for her!! :)
    xo TJ

    ReplyDelete
  3. Miss Jack Lewis Baillot - fortunately, the kidnapper reveal isn't until about ten minutes before the end, and you can see the "scary" bit coming because the tension builds to that.

    Overall, it is actually a decent if not the most brilliant thriller.

    Thanks for stopping by - do so again soon. :-)

    TJ - I thought the suspense was actually decent. There wasn't a lot of "action" so the movie needed that in order to succeed.

    Amanda did well enough in the role - she wasn't an Angelina Jolie in Salt but this isn't that kind of movie. You are right: Good for her!

    Thanks! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Dear! I'm Gianna, and I'm new to blogging! I would more than appreciate for you to come check out my blog! here at,
    randocology.blogspot.com -

    If you do come, make sure and let me know, leave me a comment, or follow me!
    xoxo,
    Gianna

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lovely to "meet" you, Gianna.

    Welcome to blogging! It is great fun. :-) Thank you for stopping by - please do so again.

    Off to check out your blog. =)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes ma'am this one's on my list to watch. I too think it's a good move on Amanda S's part to try to diversify what she can play. Kinda getting tired of her roles recently. So this one definitely intrigues me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Really? I have liked everything Amanda has starred in. She usually impresses.

    Enjoy this one! I thought it was actually not bad.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I absolutely love Amanda Seyfried, she's definitely one of my favorite actresses, and she definitely can play any role she wants. Although I'm too terrified to watch this movie, I'm sure she was fabulous in it, as always! Thanks for stopping by my blog and leaving comments! Looking forward to reading more reviews!
    Juliet

    ReplyDelete
  9. As do I, Juliet. I think she is always great and adorable.

    Oh, really? You aren't a big thriller fan, huh?! That is okay. As a child I was freaked out by a mystery and didn't want to have anything to do with them after that... as is proof from the reviews on this blog, I've totally overcome that now. LOL! ;-)

    Oh, goody! I've got more this week - starting tomorrow morning! Thanks for stopping by!!

    ReplyDelete

Have a thought? Don't be shy, go ahead and leave one... or two... or three! I reply to every comment. If you're new to the blog, please don't hesitate to introduce yourself and your blog - we love chatting around here!

Feedback and every comment is appreciated and read - I always leave a response; your opinions are respected and I ask that you show mine the same courtesy.

(If you post under “anonymous,” please leave a name. If you don't have a Google account, you can type your name into the Name/URL and if you have no site, just leave "URL" blank.)

If you are still reading my ramblings, thank you for following this little blog and for being one of its supporters. I’ve enjoyed getting to know each of you, friends!

[name=Rissi] [img=Your Image Url Here] [description=auburn-hair. #bookblogger. downton abbey. inspys. internet-photo-shy. silver petticoat contributor. writer. the aspiration is to someday write professionally. a girl can dream, right?] (facebook=https://www.facebook.com/FindingWonderlandBlog/) (twitter=https://twitter.com/rissijc) (instagram=https://instagram.com/rissi006) (bloglovin=https://www.bloglovin.com/blogs/dreaming-under-same-moon-3249983) (pinterest=Pinterest Profile Url) (tumblr=Tumblr Profile Url)